Retiring Raven Haloti Ngata: Breaking Ben Roethlisberger’s nose was favorite play of career | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Retiring Raven Haloti Ngata: Breaking Ben Roethlisberger’s nose was favorite play of career

Chris Adamski
1228496_web1_1224995-23d49bea5de14765a2d833937285cda8
Former Baltimore Ravens NFL football player Haloti Ngata, right, sheds a tear as he speaks about his retirement from the during a news conference with former head coach Brian Billick, left, Wednesday, May 29, 2019, in Owings Mills, Md. (AP Photo/Gail Burton)

Another of the principle protagonists of the heyday of the Pittsburgh Steelers-Baltimore Ravens rivalry is retiring. And this one cites one of the height of the rivalry’s most infamous plays as one that stood out most.

Speaking at a news conference in Baltimore on Wednesday that both announced his retirement and announced his induction into the Ravens’ Ring of Honor, former nose tackle Haloti Ngata was asked whether he had a favorite play from his 13-year career NFL.

According to PennLive.com, Ngata “chuckled and brought up the one that many Ravens fans still reference on a routine basis.”

“Breaking Ben’s nose,” Ngata said, per PennLive, as a room filled mostly with his family members, fans and former teammates erupted with laughter. “I didn’t do it on purpose. It just kind of happened.”

That sack was one of 32 ½ in Ngata’s career, one of 25 ½ over his nine seasons with the Ravens and one of six in 18 games against the Steelers (most against any team).

Ngata also had more total tackles (66), solo tackles (39), QB hits (11), interceptions (two) and tackles for loss (12) versus the Steelers than against any other team.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.