Riverhounds’ Greenspan named USL Championship Defender of the Year | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Riverhounds’ Greenspan named USL Championship Defender of the Year

Greg Macafee
1963663_web1_ptr-JoeGreenspan-111919
Submitted by Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds defenseman Joe Greenspan was named the USL Championship Defender of the Year on Tuesday.

The Pittsburgh Riverhounds had one of the best defenses in the USL Championship this year, and Joe Greenspan was at the center of it.

On Tuesday, Greenspan was awarded for his efforts and was named the USL Championship Defender of the Year.

The Westfield, N.J. native was crucial to Pittsburgh’s defensive success. He tallied 151 clearances, which was good enough for fourth in the USL Championship, and helped produce a club-record 18 clean sheets throughout the season.

At one point in the season, the Riverhounds also set the second-longest shutout streak in USL Championship history at 698 minutes. As a whole, the Hounds defense conceded 32 goals, which averaged out to just less than one goal per game.


Greenspan was fourth on the Hounds in minutes played and started 31 of 32 games for the USL Eastern Conference champions.

On the offensive end, Greenspan had a career year and his 6-foot-6 range provided size and length that was valuable on Pittsburgh’s set pieces. He set career highs in goals (4), assists (2) and points (10).

In his third year with the Hounds, Greenspan also received his second-straight All-League first-team honor.

Greg Macafee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Greg by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.