ShareThis Page
Riverhounds

Riverhounds earn draw in 1st road game of season

| Saturday, April 11, 2015, 10:39 p.m.

The Riverhounds are bringing something home from their first road trip of the season.

Vini Dantas' first goal for the Riverhounds canceled out a first-half goal by Brandon Barklage, and the Riverhounds came away with a 1-1 draw Saturday in the first USL home game for expansion St. Louis.

Dantas tied the game and silenced the crowd of 5,280 in the 73rd minute with a close-range strike that came from a nice passing sequence down the right flank by the Riverhounds (1-1-1).

Kevin Kerr tracked down a long pass, and he and Lebo Moloto worked a give-and-go that allowed Kerr to find Stephen Okai for a shot from the top of the penalty area.

Okai's shot was blocked by the defense, but the ball fell to the feet of Dantas, and the Brazilian indoor soccer veteran showed his foot skill in traffic to turn and drive a shot into the open net.

Barklage got the goal for St. Louis (1-1-1) from a corner kick as the result of a pair of defensive miscues by the Riverhounds.

The St. Louis defensive midfielder was left unmarked in the center of the box, and he scored the easy goal after Riverhounds goalkeeper Ryan Thompson misplayed the inswinging corner kick from Patrick Doody under pressure from an attacker at the near post.

Thompson made amends just after halftime with a big save on his fellow Jamaican, St. Louis striker Jermie Lynch. Lynch collected the rebound of a shot by Jamiel Hardware on the left side just 6 yards from goal, but Thompson scrambled across his goal to make the point-blank save and keep the Riverhounds in range to earn the draw.

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at mgrubba@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me