Robert Morris men get home game vs. Cornell in 1st round of CIT | TribLIVE.com
Robert Morris

Robert Morris men get home game vs. Cornell in 1st round of CIT

Jerry DiPaola
896739_web1_gtr-RMUbasketball-xxxxxx

It turns out the Robert Morris women’s team’s victory Sunday in the Northeast Conference Tournament championship game wasn’t the last at the North Athletic Complex.

The men’s team will host Cornell at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the first round of the CollegeInsider.com Tournament (CIT). The North Athletic Complex is the temporary on-campus home for Robert Morris’ men’s and women’s teams before they move into UPMC Events Center next season.

The Colonials (17-16) will make their second appearance in the CIT and eighth in any postseason tournament in the past 12 seasons. Robert Morris advanced to the CIT quarterfinals in 2012, beating Indiana State and Toledo on the road.

Robert Morris finished in a tie for third place in the Northeast Conference (11-7) this season, led by senior guard Josh Williams, who is averaging 13.9 points.

Cornell (15-15, 7-7 Ivy League) lost two games to ACC opponents — Syracuse, 63-55, and Wake Forest, 83-61. Sophomore forward Jimmy Boeheim, son of Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim, is Cornell’s second-leading scorer (11.2 points per game). Matt Morgan leads the team at 22.1.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Robert Morris
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.