Ryan Shazier, James Conner nominated for George Halas Award | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Ryan Shazier, James Conner nominated for George Halas Award

Joe Rutter
1196195_web1_gtr-shazier-032119
Pittsburgh Steelers running back and Pittsburgh alumnus James Conner, left, watches Pittsburgh football players go through drills during their Pro Day beside injured Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier, Wednesday, March 20, 2019, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Two Pittsburgh Steelers players are nominees for this year’s George Halas Award.

Running back James Conner and linebacker Ryan Shazier are among the five finalists for the award, which is given to the NFL player, coach or staff member who overcomes the most adversity to succeed.

The award is presented by the Pro Football Writers of America.

Balloting runs through May 31, with the winner being announced June 3.

Other nominees are New York Giants general manager Dave Gettleman, retired Houston Texans safety Andre Hal and Indianapolis Colts quarterback Andrew Luck.

Conner, who famously overcame Hodgkin’s lymphoma while at Pitt, led the Steelers in rushing last season and was named to the Pro Bowl. Shazier continues to recover from a spinal cord injury in December 2017 that left him temporarily paralyzed and put his football career on hold. The latest improvement for Shazier came recently when he danced at his wedding.

Gettleman was diagnosed with lymphoma last year. Hal also had Hodgkin’s lymphoma and returned to football last season when he started two games and had three interceptions. He retired after the season.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.