Saint Vincent women lose to Thomas More in NCAA Tournament first round |
District College

Saint Vincent women lose to Thomas More in NCAA Tournament first round


For more than two quarters, the Saint Vincent women looked like they were poised to pull off one of the biggest upsets in college basketball this season. Matched against No. 1-ranked Thomas More (27-0), a team that beat Saint Vincent by 36 in January in Latrobe, the Bearcats led by two two minutes into the second half of a first-round NCAA Division III Tournament game.

That’s when the Saints showed why they were the scourge of the Presidents’ Athletic Conference during their tenure there.

Emily Schultz and Madison Temple had double-doubles, and Thomas More pulled away in the second half for a 79-54 victory at the Saints’ home in Crestview Hills, Ky. Saint Vincent, which won the PAC title and finished 23-5, was outscored 52-30 in the second half.

In the first half, the Bearcats forced 15 turnovers and held Temple, who is fifth in the nation in scoring at 23.6 points, to four points and were within 27-24 at halftime. Madison Kollar (Latrobe) had a pair of 3-pointers, and Maria Morgan had a 3 and a layup in the first 2 minutes, 2 seconds of the the third quarter to give the Bearcats a 35-33 lead.

College Videos

It would be their last lead as the Saints dominated down the stretch.

Kollar had 17 to lead Saint Vincent, and Morgan and Jenna Lafko (Hampton) had 11 each. Shelby Rupp led Thomas More with 18 points and had nine rebounds. Schultz had 16 points and 11 rebounds, and Temple had 12 points and 15 rebounds. The three combined to shoot 21 of 31 from the field.

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.