Saints, Rams meet in rematch of controversial NFC title game |

Saints, Rams meet in rematch of controversial NFC title game

In this Jan. 20, 2019, file photo, Los Angeles Rams’ Nickell Robey-Coleman breaks up a pass intended for New Orleans Saints’ Tommylee Lewis during the second half of the NFC championship game in New Orleans. The New Orleans Saints visit Los Angeles for a rematch of the NFC championship game won by the Rams, but remembered for the no-call that created the opening for Sean McVay’s team to storm through.

LOS ANGELES — The Rams would like to beat the Saints this time without help from the absence of a flag.

Los Angeles’ 26-23 overtime win over New Orleans in last season’s NFC championship game had wild momentum swings and exciting performances from two of the best offenses in NFL history — and two defenses who did a surprisingly solid job of slowing them.

But the game is sure to go down in football annals mostly for the uncalled pass interference by Rams cornerback Nickell Robey-Coleman against Saints receiver Tommylee Lewis late in the fourth quarter.

Although the legal challenges were dropped this week, many Saints fans still haven’t stopped complaining about the non-call that prompted the NFL to change its replay review rules in the offseason.

“That’s a New Orleans problem,” Rams cornerback Aqib Talib said. “That’s not an LA problem.”

The Rams and their fans have a different overriding reflection they’re taking into the teams’ marquee early-season rematch at the Coliseum on Sunday.

“I remember we won,” Rams defensive coordinator Wade Phillips said. “That’s what I remember.”

Indeed, the Rams reached their first Super Bowl in 17 years after holding the Saints’ high-octane offense to 290 yards and allowing just 10 points after the first quarter.

Phillips and his defense will try for a repeat of that excellence against Drew Brees, Alvin Kamara and Michael Thomas, while the Saints’ defense must contend again with Todd Gurley, Jared Goff and the Rams’ quietly devastating corps of receivers.

Their fans might be another matter, but the Saints (1-0) aren’t wasting time thinking about the Super Bowl that got away. Coach Sean Payton realizes his team got the ball first in overtime, but couldn’t finish.

“It feels like it was a long time ago,” Payton said. “It’s part of our game. These are two different teams now. A lot of roster moves from last year to this year. We’re playing each other early in the season, so it doesn’t feel like that many games ago … but you’re looking at two different teams.”

They might be different, but they’re both expected to be major contenders in the NFC again this year. The Rams’ home opener will allow one team to set a tone in the conference race.

“There’s nothing that we’re taking from last year as motivation,” Goff said. “If they are, great. It’s just another game for us, and it’s our home opener after not being at home for a long time.”

The Saints’ offensive line passed its first big test in Week 1, allowing one sack on a linebacker blitz and neutralizing 2018 AFC sacks leader J.J. Watt, holding him without a single significant defensive statistic.

The only time Watt influenced the game was when Ryan Ramczyk, his main blocker, was flagged for holding early in the fourth quarter.

Now the Saints must find a way to slow down 2018 NFL sacks leader Aaron Donald (Penn Hills/Pitt).

“He’s got such a high motor,” Brees said. “He is full-go, all the time. He is so multiple in the things that he can do, the moves that he can give you, the inside, the outside, the rip, the jump. I don’t even have names for all the moves that he can do to get to the quarterback. You cannot block him with one guy. He’s just that good a player.

“He’s such an impact player. He can change the game. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen anybody like him.”

As for the Rams, the concerns about Gurley’s apparently balky knee looked fairly unfounded in the opener at Carolina, where he rushed for 97 yards and looked dangerous.

The Rams still expect to use backup Malcolm Brown extensively, but Gurley and an offensive line with two new starters appeared to be in solid form so far. Gurley participated in practice Wednesday and Thursday this week, not taking a day off to rest.


The Rams appeared to find a formula for covering Thomas, the Los Angeles native whose Twitter handle includes the phrase, “can’t guard Mike.” It took getting burned once to do it.

In a 2018 regular-season meeting, Thomas went off for 12 catches for 211 yards, highlighted by a 72-yard touchdown that he celebrated by pulling an old flip phone out of the goal post padding, as former Saints receiver Joe Horn had once done.

In that game, Thomas was primarily covered by Marcus Peters. However, the Rams changed their strategy for defending Thomas in a rematch in the NFC title game, using a combination of Peters, Aqib Talib and Robey-Coleman. Thomas had just four catches for 36 yards and no touchdowns in that game.

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.