7 Pitt wrestlers earn national ranking as NCAA tournament approaches | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

7 Pitt wrestlers earn national ranking as NCAA tournament approaches

Jerry DiPaola
822514_web1_gtr-mickeyphillippi-
Pitt’s Micky Phillippi (right) wrestles against Bucknell.

With only 19 days before the NCAA wrestling tournament opens at PPG Paints Arena, seven Pitt wrestlers are ranked among the top 33 by the Division I coaches panel.

Leading the way is Micky Phillippi of Derry, who is No. 5 (4 in the RPI) and 17-2 at 133 pounds.

Nino Bonaccorsi of Bethel Park is No. 9 (8 in the RPI) at 184 pounds with an 18-5 record. Mt. Lebanon graduate Kellan Stout (12-6) is No. 22 (but No. 12 in the RPI) at 197 pounds.

At 285 pounds, Demetriius Thomas (24-3) is No. 13 (11 in the RPI); Taleb Rahmani (15-5) is No. 11 (13 in the RPI) at 157; and Gregg Harvey (11-8) is No, 32 (25 in the RPI) at 174.

The ACC was awarded 37 automatic qualifiers from its conference tournament, which will hosted by Virginia Tech on March 9. The conference will qualify between two and five wrestlers at each weight class. Five will come from the 184-pound weight division.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.