ShareThis Page
Seven Pitt wrestlers ranked nationally by coaches panel |

Seven Pitt wrestlers ranked nationally by coaches panel

Jerry DiPaola
Pitt’s Micky Phillippi (right) wrestles against Bucknell.

Led by redshirt freshman Micky Phillippi at 133 pounds, seven Pitt wrestlers are included in the second of four coaches’ panel rankings that will be part of the selection and seeding process for the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships on March 21-23 at PPG Paints Arena.

Phillippi (15-2) is fourth in the rankings and No. 1 in the first RPI listing of the season. Redshirt freshman Nino Bonaccorsi (16-5) is 10th in the rankings at 184 pounds and No. 4 in the RPI.

At 285 pounds, junior Demetrius Thomas (22-2) is 11th in the rankings, No. 7 in the RPI.

At 157, redshirt junior Taleb Rahmani (13-5) is 13th in the rankings and the RPI.

At 197, redshirt junior Kellan Stout (12-4) is No. 20 in the rankings, unranked in the RPI.

At 141, senior L.J. Bentley (14-7) is 28th in the rankings, No. 22 in the RPI.

At 174, redshirt sophomore Gregg Harvey is 32nd in the rankings, No. 23 in the RPI.

Coaches rankings are compiled by a vote of coaches representing each qualifying tournament Wrestlers will be measured by winning percentage, RPI and coaches rankings to earn allocation berths for the qualifying tournaments for the nationals.

Pitt, which is ranked No. 15 nationally in the team rankings, will wrestle against Duke in a dual match at 7 p.m. Friday at Fitzgerald Field House.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.