Seven-run inning carries Hempfield East to victory at state legion tourney | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Seven-run inning carries Hempfield East to victory at state legion tourney

Paul Schofield
1468831_web1_web-Baseballstock4

A seven-run third inning erased an early deficit and helped Hempfield East rally for an impressive 11-5 victory against South Parkland in the Pennsylvania American Legion tournament at Showers Field in DuBois.

It was Hempfield East’s second consecutive victory in the tournament. It will play Swoyersville, which defeated Hopewell, 8-1, at 6:45 p.m. Monday.

Hempfield East opened the tournament by defeating Paxton on Saturday.

South Parkland, which beat Bristol, 15-0, during Day 1, jumped out to a 4-1 lead after two innings against Hempfield East pitcher Shane Stuchell, who earned the win.

Hempfield East scored seven runs on just three hits in the third inning.

Andrew Rosenberg started the frame with a walk, and Hunter Eperesi was hit by a pitch.

After Matt Wicker walked to load the bases, a Reid Hipps single scored two runs.

Then Noah Sweeney tied the score with a double. Dom Carrera’s bunt gave East the lead, and Jack McBride’s double made it 8-4.

Carrera added an RBI single in the sixth inning, and Eperesi had a two-run double in the seventh inning.

Stuchell settled down after the second inning. He allowed a run in the seventh inning, scattered six hits and didn’t walk a batter.

Hempfield East had 12 hits, including two apiece from Hertzog, Eperesi, Sweeney and Carrera. Eperesi, Hipps and Carrera had two RBIs each.

In other action, Bristol defeated Paxton, 4-3, and French Creek Valley edged DuBois, 7-6.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.