Sharks’ Logan Couture thought he lost a testicle on shot block |

Sharks’ Logan Couture thought he lost a testicle on shot block

Matt Rosenberg
The San Jose Sharks’ Logan Couture scores goal against Vegas Golden Knights goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury during the first period of Game 2 on Friday, April 12, 2019, in San Jose, Calif.

Losing to the Vegas Golden Knights might not have been the most painful part.

San Jose Sharks forward Logan Couture, sacrificing his body in the way only hockey players can this time of year, blocked a shot by the Golden Knights’ Cody Eakin during Game 2 of their Western Coference first-round series Friday night.

And … well … just watch.

Yeah. Ouch.

The block occurred midway through the second period, and Couture left the ice, but he returned for the start of the third period.

After the game, which Vegas won 5-3 to tie the series at 1-1, Couture told reporters what happened on the block.

“I thought I lost my testicle,” Couture said.

“Is it still there?” a reporter followed.

“Luckily,” Couture said, grinning among the chuckles from the media scrum.

The Sharks rallied from a 3-0 deficit in the first period to tie the game at 3-3 before the first intermission.

Couture scored the first of three Sharks goals within 2 minutes, 9 seconds, the last of which came with less than a minute to play in the first period. Mark Stone and Williams Karlsson scored for Vegas in the second and third periods, and Marc-Andre Fleury made 34 saves for Vegas.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NHL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.