ShareThis Page
Sidney Crosby’s all-star performance wows Penguins teammate |

Sidney Crosby’s all-star performance wows Penguins teammate

Jonathan Bombulie
| Sunday, January 27, 2019 6:42 p.m
Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Matt Murray (30) celebrates with Sidney Crosby (87) after the Penguins defeated the New York Rangers 7-2 in an NHL hockey game Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2019, at Madison Square Garden in New York. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun)

After spending most of the weekend holed up in his hotel room with an illness, Pittsburgh Penguins captain Sidney Crosby emerged at the NHL All-Star Game on Saturday night and claimed MVP honors with a four-goal, four-assist performance.

Neither of those two developments surprised goalie Matt Murray, who spent part of the team’s weeklong midseason break with Crosby in Wyoming.

He wasn’t surprised Crosby got sick.

“The cold weather in Jackson Hole actually got me too a little bit,” Murray said, sniffling.

He was even less surprised that he was the best player on the ice in San Jose.

“I don’t think any of us are anymore,” Murray said. “He’s so good.”

The Pittsburgh market delivered the second-best ratings in the country for the game on NBC, finishing behind Buffalo and ahead of St. Louis, Minneapolis and Las Vegas.

Murray was one of those watching on television. In addition to being impressed by Crosby’s exploits, he said he couldn’t help but feel sympathy for the goalies.

“That’s what they’re looking for,” Murray said. “It’s three-on-three. It’s breakaways, two-on-ohs. I think I saw a three-on-oh when I was watching. Obviously it’s a lot looser than a regular overtime too, so it’s even more open.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.