Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster expects to be focus of Patriots’ gameplan |

Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster expects to be focus of Patriots’ gameplan

Joe Rutter
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster (19) runs a play against the Tennessee Titans in the first half of a preseason NFL football game Sunday, Aug. 25, 2019, in Nashville, Tenn.

Since Antonio Brown was traded to the Oakland Raiders in March, the Pittsburgh Steelers have faced endless questions about how the offense will fare without the All-Pro wide receiver.

The answer will become clearer Sunday night when the Steelers open at defending Super Bowl champion New England.

“Turn on the TV and watch,” wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster said Thursday. “That’s all I can say.”

The Steelers added veteran free agent Donte Moncrief, drafted Diontae Johnson and are expecting James Washington to take on a bigger role. Yet, Smith-Schuster is the receiver expected to get the double teams that Brown constantly faced.

After all, in Brown’s final season with the Steelers, it was Smith-Schuster who led the team with 111 catches and 1,426 en route to a Pro Bowl appearance in his second NFL season.

Smith-Schuster expects Patriots coach Bill Belichick to devise a scheme designed to shut him down.

“I won’t be surprised if he doubles me,” Smith-Schuster said. “I’m very confident in my guys going out there and making plays in one-on-one coverage.”

The Patriots’ top cornerback is Stephon Gilmore, who was named first-team All-Pro in 2018. Smith-Schuster could see a lot of Gilmore on Sunday night.

“In past history, Gilmore usually is on their best receiver,” Smith-Schuster said. “He’s a vet, a tough guy, great player. If I have an opportunity to go against him, it would be amazing.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.