Some Steelers surprises as Madden NFL 20 releases player rankings |

Some Steelers surprises as Madden NFL 20 releases player rankings

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers offensive guard David DeCastro goes through drills during mini camp Tuesday June 11, 2109 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

According to the minds behind the popular Madden NFL 20 video game, the best players on the Pittsburgh Steelers roster aren’t necessarily who you might think.

According to the video game, which ranks all NFL players on a 99-point scale for attributes such as awareness, speed, acceleration, agility and strength, the Steelers’ best player is offensive lineman David DeCastro with a 93 overall rating.

He’s the second-best right guard in the league behind Dallas’ Zack Martin.

He’s followed in the overall rankings by receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster (88), defensive lineman Cameron Heyward (86), offensive tackle Alejandro Villaneuva (86), center Maurkice Pouncey (85), quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (85) and defensive lineman Stephon Tuitt (85).

Here’s where things get a little unexpected.

The fastest player on the Steelers roster according to Madden? Recently signed free agent wide receiver Johnny Holton.

The strongest player on the team? Third-string center Patrick Morris, a TCU grad who spent last year on the practice squad.

The game also shows no love for long snappers. Kameron Canaday is rated as the worst player on the Steelers roster with an overall ranking of 37.

According to the game, the top players in the league are Rams defensive lineman Aaron Donald, Texans receiver Deandre Hopkins, Bears linebacker Khalil Mack and Seahawks linebacker Bobby Wagner, who got 99 ratings.

The game goes on sale Aug. 2.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.