Somehow, Pirates TV ratings go up this season |

Somehow, Pirates TV ratings go up this season

Jonathan Bombulie
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates second baseman Adam Frazier reacts after being hit by a pitch during a game against the Tigers Tuesday, June 18, 2019, at PNC Park.

The Pittsburgh Pirates went 25-48 after the All-Star break, had several members of the organization get into physical confrontations in the clubhouse and fired manager Clint Hurdle at season’s end.

And that’s to say nothing of the real-world horror of the arrest of closer Felipe Vazquez on sex crimes charges last month.

Still, somehow, their television ratings on AT&T Sportsnet went up.

According to an article on, 13 of the 29 regional sports networks that carry Major League Baseball saw an increase in ratings for games, and the Pirates were one of them.

Ratings were up 4% from last season, increasing from a 4.75 to a 4.95. That’s the eighth-best rating in baseball.

In real numbers, average viewership increased from 54,000 to 55,000. That total ranks 17th in baseball.

The MLB ratings champion this season was Cleveland with a 7.18 rating. Miami had the worst rating at 0.86.

The team with the biggest increase from last season was San Diego, up 78%. The biggest loser was Texas, down 35%.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.