Stanley Cup Final a hit in Pittsburgh TV market, but not as big as last year |

Stanley Cup Final a hit in Pittsburgh TV market, but not as big as last year

Jonathan Bombulie
St. Louis Blues fans celebrate at the Enterprise Center in St. Louis after the Blues defeated the Boston Bruins 4-1 in Game 7 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup Final in Boston, Wednesday, June 12, 2019.

A Stanley Cup Final matchup between the St. Louis Blues and Boston Bruins was popular with local television viewers, but nowhere near as popular as last season’s meeting between the Washington Capitals and the Vegas Golden Knights.

Wednesday’s Game 7, a 4-1 victory that gave St. Louis its first Stanley Cup, was the most-watched hockey game since the current ratings system was put in place in 1994, drawing more than 8.9 million viewers for NBC Sports nationally, counting TV and internet streaming. The overnight TV rating was 4.90.

Pittsburgh was the seventh-ranked market in the country with a 9.2 rating, trailing St. Louis, Boston, Providence, Buffalo, Kansas City and Ft. Myers, Fla.

Eleven markets set an all-time ratings record for a game not involving a home team, but Pittsburgh wasn’t one of them. That distinction belongs to last year’s clinching Game 5 victory for the Capitals over Marc-Andre Fleury and the Golden Knights, which drew a 10.7 rating.

Pittsburgh was the sixth-ranked market in the country for the final series with a 5.3 rating. That’s down from an 8.1 last year.

Pittsburgh was the fifth-ranked market in the country for the playoffs as a whole, tied with Denver with a 2.0 rating. Last year, Pittsburgh tied with Vegas for the top spot with a 4.5.

This year, the Penguins played only four playoff games, bowing out in a first-round sweep against the New York Islanders. Last year, they played 12 playoff games.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all offseason long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.