Steady Jackson has 2-shot lead at WPGA Amateur Championship |
Other Local

Steady Jackson has 2-shot lead at WPGA Amateur Championship

Paul Schofield
Paul Schofield | Tribune-Review
Palmer Jackson putts for birdie on No. 18 during the Western Pennsylvania Golf Association’s Amateur Championship on Tuesday, July 2, 2019, at Oakmont Country Club.
Paul Schofield | Tribune-Review
Chuck Nettles putts while his brother, Tommy, caddies during the Western Pennsylvania Golf Association’s Amateur Championship on Tuesday, July 2, 2019, at Oakmont Country Club.

If Palmer Jackson wants to capture the 119th Western Pennsylvania Golf Association’s Amateur Championship on Wednesday, he knows he has to play better than his first two rounds.

The Murrysville native and future Notre Dame golfer shot a 1-under-par 70 on Tuesday at Oakmont Country Club and is even through two rounds at 142, two shots ahead of co-first-round leader Indiana’s Kyle Grube.

Greensburg native and West Virginia golfer Mark Goetz is third at 3-over, and Peters Township’s Connor Schmidt and Oakmont’s Nathan Sutherland are tied for fourth at 4-over.

Jack Katarincic of Fox Chapel, the low amateur at last week’s Frank B. Fuhrer Jr. Invitational, is sixth at 5-over.

Jackson and Schmidt are the only golfers to post under-par scores (1-under) during the two days.

The original field of 78 was cut down to 34 for the final round, which begins at 7:45 a.m. for the final round.

Jackson’s finish was much better than his first round when he bogeyed three of his final six holes. Tuesday, after a 30-minute lightning delay, he finished with three consecutive pars. He was 2-under on the back nine after birdies on Nos. 10 and 12.

It was No. 10 that cost Jackson the WPIAL Class AAA title last fall.

“I hit hybrid and almost holed my second shot,” Jackson said about No. 10. “This course is so tough. You have to play within yourself and try to put yourself in a good spot for Wednesday, and that’s what I did.”

His bogey came on No. 7 when he drove into the rough and three-putted from 80 feet.

“I love being in the final group,” Jackson said. “If you don’t want to be in the final group, you shouldn’t be playing.

“I was just trying to put myself in a good spot for the final round. After the delay I had a 12-footer for par and made that, and on No. 17 my caddie talked me into laying up, which I never do, and I made par.”

Jackson said it would be a great accomplishment to win the championship.

Goetz shot a 1-over 73 on Tuesday.

He bogeyed two of his final three holes after the delay. He started on No. 10 and bogeyed Nos. 7 and 9.

“I played solid the last two days,” Goetz said. “I didn’t get into too many bad spots. That was big. I made a good par save on No. 8, and it was another solid day. I had a few more putts drop.”

Goetz said the conditions the first two days of the tournament were similar. He said the greens were a little faster during the first round.

“I just wanted to give myself a chance to win the tournament,” Goetz said. “I want to be close heading into the final nine holes.”

Schmidt had a great round going early. He was 5-under for his round through 12 holes, but he stumbled in with two bogeys and a double-bogey 6 on No. 17.

“I wish I could have finished better,” Schmidt said. “But this course can grab you. I just didn’t finish strong.”

The Amateur Championship is one of the oldest events in the state. Past champions include Arnold Palmer, Nathan Smith, Sean Knapp and William C. Fownes. Knapp and Fownes won the title eight times each and Palmer five times.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.