Steelers 2-a-days: Will Marcus Allen break out? Tyson Alualu an ideal top DL backup |

Steelers 2-a-days: Will Marcus Allen break out? Tyson Alualu an ideal top DL backup

Chris Adamski

Editor’s note: From now until the first practice of training camp at Saint Vincent College, the Trib will be running through the Pittsburgh Steelers’ 90-man roster, assessing each player’s outlook for the 2019 season. The breakdown will go through the roster in alphabetical order, (at least) two per day, between June 14 and July 26.


Experience: 2nd season

Contract status: $643,159 cap hit in 2019, signed through 2021 season

2019 outlook: After appearing in only two games last season, Allen seems poised to make an impact on the Steelers defense in 2019. With Morgan Burnett off the roster, Allen would be a prime candidate to fill the dime/hybrid linebacker role going forward. The top backup spot at both safeties is also up for grabs with no obvious answer other than perhaps Jordan Dangerfield. In short, opportunities are there for Allen to seize.


Experience: 10th season

Contract status: Re-signed for 2 years, $5.75 million in March; $2.125 million cap hit in 2019

2019 outlook: Alualu was a perfect fit as the Steelers’ No. 4 defensive lineman the past two seasons, and it was a savvy signing to bring him back in that role at age 32. The former top-10 draft pick hasn’t been a star in the NFL but has been a steady, reliable, smart and versatile defensive lineman. He’s quality depth and good insurance behind Cameron Heyward, Stephon Tuitt and Javon Hargarve.


June 14: Ola Adeniyi, Brian Allen

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.