Steelers at No. 18 in NBC’s Peter King’s offseason NFL power rankings |

Steelers at No. 18 in NBC’s Peter King’s offseason NFL power rankings

Chris Adamski

During the Bill Cowher/Mike Tomlin eras for the Pittsburgh Steelers (since 1992), they have much more often than not been one of the NFL’s better teams. A perennial playoff contender – if not, at times, a legitimate Super Bowl contender – the Steelers have had just three losing records over the past 27 seasons.

By any measure, they’ve consistently been above average.

But the national pundits are beginning to say that’s not the case anymore.

Less than a week after ESPN pegged the Steelers as the 16th-best of the 32 NFL teams, on Monday the offseason power rankings were released by respected longtime NFL reporter Peter King.

It was even less kind to the Steelers.

The Steelers were at 18th in the NFL, just ahead of Oakland and Jacksonville and one spot behind Atlanta.

The Raiders (4-12), Jaguars (5-11) and Falcons (7-9) – like the Steelers (9-6-1 in 2018) – missed the playoffs last season.

Here is what King wrote in his piece about the Steelers:

It’s going to be peaceful in Pittsburgh without the weekly (daily?) questions about Le’Veon Bell and Antonio Brown. But with all the distractions and discord last year, the Steelers still averaged 26.8 points per game, and I’ll be surprised if they reach those heights this year. Steelers players might find it more placid coming to work and games this year with Antonio Brown 2,300 miles away, but how are they replacing Brown’s 115 catches a year over the last five seasons? With James Washington? Donte Moncrief? Doubt it. More likely, Pittsburgh turns to the man who cost them first, second and third-round picks on draft day, linebacker Devin Bush, and hopes he can be the sideline-to-sideline presence Ryan Shazier was until that fateful night in Cincinnati late in the 2017 season.

The Steelers are graded by King as third among the four AFC North teams behind Cleveland (No. 11) and Baltimore (No. 12) and ahead of No. 30 Cincinnati. Going by the order of King’s power rankings alone, he sees the AFC playoff field as Kansas City (No. 1 overall in his rankings), New England (No. 2), Indianapolis (No. 3), L.A. Chargers (No. 5), Cleveland and Baltimore.

The most recent time the Steelers finished among the bottom half of the league standings was 2003, when they went 6-10 in the season before drafting Ben Roethlisberger.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.