Steelers could face Patriots with two new starters on defense |

Steelers could face Patriots with two new starters on defense

Joe Rutter
Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Devin Bush (55) stands on the sidelines during the second half of an NFL football game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in Pittsburgh, Friday, Aug. 9, 2019.

Based on the participation report in practice Thursday, it’s looking more likely the Pittsburgh Steelers will open the season against the New England Patriots with a rookie inside linebacker and a free safety also playing in his first NFL game.

Sean Davis did not practice again because of an ankle injury, increasing the likelihood that first-year player Kameron Kelly will make his NFL debut at free safety. Inside linebacker Mark Barron also did not practice because of a “coach’s decision.” That provided more reps for rookie first-rounder Devin Bush, who also could start against the Patriots.

Defensive coordinator Keith Butler was asked if having two unproven starters is a problematic way to take a team into Foxborough, Mass., to face the defending Super Bowl champions.

“I don’t think there’s ever a right way to go to Foxborough with the quarterback that (Tom Brady) is,” Butler said. “But we’re not going to shy away from it, either. I’m confident in those guys that they’ll play and do the best they can.”

Butler wouldn’t speculate on how much time Bush will get in the opener. Having a rookie in the middle of the defense provides an inviting target for Brady to exploit, but Butler isn’t concerned about Bush being overmatched.

“He’s going to be all right,” he said. “He’s still a rookie. He respects the game, and as long as he respects the game he’s going to be all right.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.