Steelers credit Marlon Humphrey more than blame JuJu Smith-Schuster |

Steelers credit Marlon Humphrey more than blame JuJu Smith-Schuster

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster celebrates with the fans after a first-quarter touchdown against the Ravens Sunday, Oct. 6, 2019 at Heinz Field.

First, it was Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin beginning his postgame news conference by crediting Marlon Humphrey for his “big-time play.”

Soon after, guard David DeCastro was among the Steelers players who noted Humphrey’s “good technique” on his forced fumble in overtime that set up the winning field goal in the Baltimore Ravens’ 26-23 win against the Steelers.

A common theme was acknowledging the play Humphrey made — and not a miscue by JuJu Smith-Schuster in his fumble.

Though Smith-Schuster said he felt “terrible,” the Steelers receiver likewise tipped his cap to Humphrey, the Ravens’ former first-round pick cornerback.

“Marlon Humphrey, that’s what he does,” Smith-Schuster said. “He made a great play in a great situation, and he came through for his team.”

And for the second time over a span of seven Steelers regular-season games, Smith-Schuster did not come through with the ball in his hands late in a tight game. His fumble on the Steelers’ first possession of overtime Sunday was reminiscent of his fumble late during the fourth quarter of a Week 16 game last December at New Orleans.

Smith-Schuster said there wasn’t much he could do differently.

“Just protect the ball,” he said. “Squeeze it harder.”

Smith-Schuster entered the weekend listed as questionable on the injury report because of a toe injury that has been bothering him since late in the season opener. He played Sunday, but he appeared to be hobbled at times and often was seen stretching his legs and feet/ankles.

Still, Smith-Schuster said his foot was “good.”

He finished with seven catches for 75 yards and a touchdown, a vast improvement in production from last week’s game when he had three catches for 15 yards. Still, his season totals of 24 catches for 333 yards are off his pace from 2018, his second NFL season when he finished with 111 receptions for 1,426 yards.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.