Steelers cut kicker Matt McCrane, cornerback Jack Tocho |

Steelers cut kicker Matt McCrane, cornerback Jack Tocho

Joe Rutter
Steelers place kicker Matt McCrane warms up for the Bengals game Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018 at Heinz Field.

The Pittsburgh Steelers plan to stay true to their word and provide competition for kicker Chris Boswell in training camp this summer.

It just won’t involve Matt McCrane.

McCrane, who converted all three of his field-goal attempts in the Steelers’ season-finale against Cincinnati, was one of two players waived by the team Thursday afternoon. Also cut was cornerback Jack Tocho, a product of the defunct Alliance of American Football.

When the Steelers signed Matthew Wright as an undrafted free agent after the NFL Draft, it gave them three kickers on the 91-man offseason roster. With McCrane gone, Wright will provide the only competition for Boswell, who made 13 of 20 field-goal attempts last year for a career-worst 65 percent conversion rate.

Signed to a contract in the final week of the season after Boswell went on injured reserve with a groin injury, McCrane kicked field goals of 39, 47 and 35 yards in the Steelers’ 16-13 win against the Bengals on Dec. 30.

Tocho was a seventh-round pick by the Minnesota Vikings in 2017. He played for the Birmingham Iron of the AAF this winter but was signed by the Steelers three days after the upstart league ceased operations.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.