Another interception for Steelers 1st-team defense at OTAs | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Another interception for Steelers 1st-team defense at OTAs

Chris Adamski
1194538_web1_gtr-tedk-072618
Pittsburgh Steelers safety Terrell Edmunds (34) during an NFL football practice, Wednesday, June 6, 2018, in Pittsburgh.

One of the Pittsburgh Steelers’ priorities for this season was to increase their takeaways.

It’s extremely early — but so far, so good in that department.

For the second consecutive day at organized team activities, the Steelers first-team defense intercepted Ben Roethlisberger during the “seven shots” drill that traditionally opens the team portion of every practice.

That means that among eight 2-point conversion-style plays between the first-team offense and first-team defense so far, two were intercepted. It was cornerback Joe Haden on Tuesday and safety Terrell Edmunds on Wednesday.

Not bad considering the Steelers intercepted just eight of their opponents’ 566 passes last season.

“I think that’s one of the reasons why they brought me in,” newly signed cornerback Steven Nelson said Wednesday, “because I did have a few interceptions (four last season for Kansas City). But they have been preaching not just to me but this whole group — this whole offseason — turnovers are big.”

Nelson said he has been getting first-team reps at outside cornerback across from Haden.

“Yeah, man, it’s fun. It’s a great atmosphere,” Nelson said of workouts with the Steelers. “And to see turnovers early, that’s a good thing.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.