Steelers Inside The Ropes: Devin Bush, Mark Barron, Vince Williams in ILB rotation |

Steelers Inside The Ropes: Devin Bush, Mark Barron, Vince Williams in ILB rotation

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review

To borrow a favorite turn of phrase of coach Mike Tomlin, the Pittsburgh Steelers’ division of labor at inside linebacker was far from clear when training camp opened Friday.

The good news, as free-agent acquisition Mark Barron said afterward, is the Steelers legitimately have three starters at inside linebacker. And that more than makes up for the bad news that there are only — at most — two available spots for inside linebackers on any given down.

For the first team-drill snap of the 2019 camp, in fact, only one was on the field. And that was rookie Devin Bush.

The No. 10 overall pick from Michigan was roaming the middle of the field when the Steelers went “dime” on the first snap of the practice-opening Seven Shots 2-point conversation-style plays (the offense went with a four-wide receiver package).

For the second play, the defense was in nickel, and veteran Vince Williams came on to join Bush.

On the third snap, Barron came in for Williams.

To start the first 11-on-11 drill about 10 minutes later, it was Williams and Bush together.

A few snaps later, Barron and Williams.

But in the next set of team drills, Barron and Bush.

You get the idea.

It’s clear the Steelers are still working through how to deploy their three starting-caliber inside linebackers. Bush played dime, indicating he might be seen as most adept against the pass.

Overall, though, the situation is filed under the “stay tuned” to see how it shakes out.

  • JuJu Smith-Schuster’s first camp practice as the clear No. 1 receiver was a good one. He caught a quick pass from Ben Roethlisberger on the first snap of Seven Shots, and he later caught long passes down the sideline from Roethlisberger during 11-on-11 drills. Once, he attacked the ball to catch it despite good coverage form Steven Nelson, another time he beat the other starting outside cornerback, Joe Haden. Only a short-armed drop early in 11-on-11s ruined an almost-perfect practice.
  • The Roethlisberger-led first-team offense scored on three of the four Seven Shots, the first-team defense posting only a “sack” on the third snap. James Conner beat Barron for a quick score on Snap 2, and Vance McDonald made a one-handed catch over Nelson on Snap 4.
  • The second-team offense fared much worse against the second-team defense, mostly because of Josh Dobbs. Dobbs threw interceptions (to Brian Allen and Cameron Sutton) on his first two snaps, and he overthrew a wide-open Christian Scotland-Williamson on the last snap.
  • Conner split the defense for a big gain on the first 11-on-11 snap, the fan-favorite running back drawing a big cheer at Chuck Noll Field.
  • Interestingly, there was at least one rep where Conner and backup Jaylen Samuels were on the field at the same time. Even more interestingly, in lieu of either playing in the backfield, they lined up wide. Roethlisberger attempted a pass over the middle on the play.
  • Devlin Hodges got few reps, which is typical for a No. 4 quarterback on a day Roethlisberger is in attendance. He showed playmaking ability, both with his arm on a long completion and by stepping up in the pocket as protection broke down and flipping an improvised pitch to Benny Snell as he approached the line of scrimmage.
  • Donte Moncrief had a strong debut. The veteran receiver had several catches, most notably when he high-pointed a Roethlisberger pass. That earned an “atta-boy” from Tomlin as Moncrief ran back into the huddle.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.