Steelers keeping door open for players to return prior to free agency |

Steelers keeping door open for players to return prior to free agency

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers tight end Jesse James speaks with Ben Roethlisberger during practice Saturday, Aug. 4, 2018 at Saint Vincent College.

INDIANAPOLIS – Backup defensive lineman Tyson Alualu was the first potential free agent to return to the Pittsburgh Steelers. Could more players follow suit before NFL free agency begins March 13?

“That could still happen within the next two weeks,” general manager Kevin Colbert said Wednesday at the NFL Combine. “We like our players. When you know a player it’s a greater comfort in keeping him than bringing in someone from the outside.”

Two starters are awaiting free agency: guard Ramon Foster and cornerback Coty Sensabaugh, who played ahead of Artie Burns for most of the season. Punter Jordan Berry also is an unrestricted free agent as are backups Jesse James, L.J. Fort and Anthony Chickillo, among others.

Before March 13, the Steelers also must decide whether to offer tenders to reserve guard/center B.J. Finney and tight end Xavier Grimble.

At tight end, starter Vance McDonald is the only player at the position under contract, so Colbert could make a push to bring back James, who had 30 receptions for a career-high 423 yards last season.

“Jesse is a nice complementary tight end to us,” Colbert said. “Any of our players who have an opportunity to look elsewhere where the might have a better chance to be a starter, we encourage them. Go, look, find out, keep us in the loop.

“If there is a way we can work it out that’s more beneficial to come back – great.”

Last year, the Steelers released a trio of defensive backs – Mike Mitchell, William Gay and Robert Golden – on the first day of the new league season in order to create salary-cap space. The Steelers already had allocated $14.54 million with a second franchise tag on running back Le’Veon Bell, and wide receiver Antonio Brown created cap space by converting most of his 2018 salary into a signing bonus.

This year, the Steelers were about $19 million under the salary cap prior to the Alualu signing, and they’ll have more money available for free agency than in recent seasons. Still, Colbert didn’t discount the possibility of the Steelers releasing veterans already under contract. Tackle Marcus Gilbert, safety Morgan Burnett and linebacker Jon Bostic are candidates based on injuries or limited playing status in 2018. Their status could be determined by what the Steelers unearth in free agency.

“You go in with a plan and this is what our timeline may be,” Colbert said. “As it unfolds, we see where it goes. We didn’t think we could afford this player, and now we can. But that may effect us, if we do this, we know we have to subtract from the other side. It’s always a give-and-take, it’s always a balance sheet that we try to keep track of.”

Colbert didn’t provide a timetable for extending quarterback Ben Roethlisberger’s contract. If the Steelers do it before mid-March, they can transfer Roethlisberger’s $5 million roster bonus into part of a signing bonus.

Colbert said the Steelers don’t need to do the Roethlisberger extension for immediate salary-cap purposes.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.