Steelers’ Keith Butler talks about Devin Bush’s fast start, getting ready for Chiefs | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Steelers’ Keith Butler talks about Devin Bush’s fast start, getting ready for Chiefs

Tim Benz
1541749_web1_gtr-steelers01-061319
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers defensive coordinator Keith Butler coordinator during OTA workouts in June 2019 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex in Pittsburgh.

In our final “Letters from Camp” podcast at Saint Vincent College, I speak with Steelers defensive coordinator Keith Butler.

It’s been a hard week for this coaching staff to focus on football, given the death of wide receivers coach Darryl Drake. But Butler has managed to turn his attention back on the field as the Steelers prepare for their second preseason game, Saturday against the Kansas City Chiefs.

Among the topics we discuss:

• Devin Bush’s fast start in Game 1 against Tampa Bay last week. Was Mike Tomlin on the mark comparing his effort to Ryan Shazier’s preseason opener?

• Questions remain about how to best deploy Mark Barron and Vince Williams with Bush. Butler gets into that conversation.

• Steven Nelson is going up against his old team. Butler tells us what attracted the Steelers to sign the former Chiefs cornerback.

• We get into the high expectations for Terrell Edmunds in his second year and whether he can be an impact player after getting so much playing time as a rookie last year.

• And we analyze the growth of two young players up front: Ola Adeniyi and Javon Hargrave.

LISTEN: Keith Butler talks about getting ready for Steelers’ second preseason game against the Chiefs

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.