Steelers’ Mark Barron breaks down team’s inside linebacker rotation | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Steelers’ Mark Barron breaks down team’s inside linebacker rotation

Tim Benz
1479962_web1_AP_19141659501066
AP
Steelers inside linebacker Mark Barron hits a blocking sled in drills during practice May 21, 2019.

“Breakfast With Benz” returns to the practice fields of Saint Vincent College today.

Oh, the players return as well.

The Steelers are back at training camp after a day off. And one position that continues to be intriguing is inside linebacker.

That’s where first-round pick Devin Bush is trying to flex his muscles to become a first-year starter. Then there is recently signed Mark Barron and veteran incumbent Vince Williams.

Much of the discussion centers around how much time those three will see together.

Likely, very little. But two at a time may happen often, as the Steelers are hoping to play more nickel defense than dime this year.

That’s if Barron and Bush can handle the coverage responsibilities, while Williams is deployed as a blitzer and a run-stuffer.

But it’s a little more intricate than that, as Barron explains in this podcast — and as we hammer out even further with some coaching explanation.

Take a listen to a recent media scrum with Barron as he delves into the inside linebacker rotation and some of the strategies involved.

LISTEN: Mark Barron on Steelers’ ILB rotation

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.