Steelers’ Tyson Alualu lines up at fullback for play vs. Ravens |

Steelers’ Tyson Alualu lines up at fullback for play vs. Ravens

Chris Adamski
Steelers defensive lineman Tyson Alualu was used as a fullback Sunday against the Ravens.

The Pittsburgh Steelers ran one play with seven offensive linemen during Sunday’s overtime loss to the Baltimore Ravens. They also again used the wildcat offense, and they ran a reverse off it.

Defensively, the Steelers showed off some new packages, including one that featured five linebackers on the field at once.

But for all their gimmickry, perhaps the most unique of all was when veteran defensive lineman Tyson Alualu lined up as a fullback for a play near the goal line late in the third quarter.

“Just something we were working on this week,” Alualu said after the game. “Goal line, short yardage. Something different is all.”


Washington, Barron injured

Other than the concussion suffered by Mason Rudolph, the lone other injuries the Steelers divulged were to receiver James Washington (shoulder) and linebacker Mark Barron (hamstring).

Coach Mike Tomlin gave some detail on Washington’s injury, saying it was “AC” in a reference to the AC joint. Washington did not finish the game.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.