Steelers offense aims to fix short-yardage troubles |

Steelers offense aims to fix short-yardage troubles

Chris Adamski
Steelers running back Jaylen Samuels (38) is stuffed by Browns defensive tackle Sheldon Richardson (98) and linebacker Joe Schobert during the first half Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, in Cleveland.
Pittsburgh Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey, guard David DeCastro and tackle Matt Feiler line up for a snap during a game against the Seattle Seahawks in September.

Last week’s game was one of the worst overall offensive performances for the Pittsburgh Steelers in recent memory. But it perhaps was only an extra yard gained here or there from turning out a whole lot different.

“It’s crazy how such little things can affect a play,” tight end Nick Vannett said after practice Friday. “It can stop you from getting a yard or two. This is a game of inches, and we want to get as many as we can.”

Too often during last week’s 21-7 loss to the Cleveland Browns, the Steelers came up a few inches — or, at most, feet — short. Eight times they lined up for plays of third- or fourth-down and 1 yard or 2 yards to go. During just one of those did they pick up the first down.

It was the continuation of a troubling trend for the Steelers offense. Among 28 chances on third- or fourth-down and 1 or 2 to go this season, it has converted only nine. That’s a 32.1% conversion rate. Only two teams in the NFL (the New York Jets and Washington Redskins) have a worse combined conversion rate for third and fourth downs of ANY distance.

To further illustrate that point, the Steelers have actually been better at picking up first downs on third or fourth downs when they needed more than 2 yards than when they needed 2 or fewer.

“On a very makeable down, a situation like third-and-1, we have to do a better job,” tight end Vance McDonald said. “But it really just comes down to the guys making silly mistakes.”

It might be a stretch to say their short-yardage troubles cost them the game last week in Cleveland, but they had three drives stall in Cleveland territory because of failings on third- and/or fourth-and-short.

Regardless of the field position, four of the seven Steelers drives that did not end in a score, a field-goal attempt, a turnover or end of a half were thwarted by short-yardage gaffes. The failings ran the gamut from everything from incomplete deep passes to wide receivers and incomplete short passes to tight ends to incomplete passes to running backs, false-start penalties and a 1-yard loss on a running play.

“We realize short yardage has been an issue for us,” coach Mike Tomlin said. “There are some ways to approach it. No. 1, we have to execute better. There is a certain meat-on-meat or bone-on-bone element of football that you can’t run away from, and short yardage is one of them. But at the same time, we could do some things from a coach’s perspective from a planning and schematics perspective to assist the guys, as well. And I think we are working in both areas.”

The Steelers did plenty of work on short-yardage offense in recent days.

“We take a lot of pride in that, and we sure have been taking lot of pride in it this week,” Vannett said. “We’ve started off with it during walkthroughs each week, and we started practice with it (this week), so we put a huge emphasis on it.”

The return of Benny Snell from a three-game absence because of knee surgery figures to help. The rookie running back prides himself on being a bruiser in short yardage.

Regardless of the runners, though, the Steelers blockers insist they will be the reason the offense gets its badly needed short yards.

“I think we are going to be a lot better,” Vannett said. “We expect to be a lot better from here on out.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.