ShareThis Page
Steelers offseason positional outlook: inside linebackers |

Steelers offseason positional outlook: inside linebackers

Chris Adamski

Editor’s note: This is Part 9 of a 12-part series breaking down the Pittsburgh Steelers at each position in the offseason. All salary cap information courtesy

It’s time for Take 2 in the Pittsburgh Steelers’ quest to find a replacement for Ryan Shazier.

Last year as the offseason began, the organization still was reeling emotionally from Shazier’s serious spinal injury. Pragmatically, though, the Steelers needed to find a way to replace the inside linebacker, who was the biggest playmaker on their defense.

For whatever reason, the Steelers never really did that. The only move they made of any consequence was to sign Jon Bostic, who joined his fifth team in six NFL seasons. Bostic filled in capably enough at left inside linebacker, starting 14 games after beating out Tyler Matakevich in training camp.

But Bostic was little more than adequate (he graded out as “average” for the season by Pro Football Focus), and it was perhaps a sign of things to come when he was barely used in the season finale Dec. 30 against Cincinnati.

Other than inking Bostic to a modest two-year, $4 million contract, the Steelers did little else to strengthen the position. After none of the top inside linebackers fell to them in the first round of the draft, the Steelers did not take a linebacker with any of their seven choices.

The only other addition was undrafted rookie free agent Matthew Thomas, who tantalized and made the 53-man roster but could not get onto the field and was allowed to leave after the season ended.

The Steelers in 2018 did re-sign starting right inside linebacker Vince Williams to a three-year extension, so that spot is set through 2021. But the man who increasingly siphoned playing time away from Bostic as 2018 went on, L.J. Fort, is an unrestricted free agent. It will be interesting to see if the Steelers offer a contract of consequence to Fort, who has long been one of their core special teams players but never had a consistent role on defense until this past season.

Matakevich has filled a similar special-teams niche as Fort since being drafted in the seventh round in 2016, and he has been bypassed several times for a more prominent defensive role.

Keith Kelsey was on injured reserve last season after he spent his rookie 2017 campaign on the Steelers practice squad. The Steelers also earlier this month signed Tegray Scales to a reserve/future contract.

The importance of inside linebackers is waning in the modern pass-happy NFL (look at how many times the Steelers used six defensive backs this past season, including many who played a hybrid inside linebacker). Still, don’t be surprised if the Steelers (again) make it a priority to acquire talent at the position in the draft and/or free agency.

Up Next: Safeties


Offseason outlook: Inside linebackers


• Vince Williams, 3 years left on contract, $6.7 million cap hit for 2019

• Jon Bostic, 1 year left on contract, $2.5 million cap hit for 2019

• Tyler Matakevich, 1 year left on contract, $735,764 cap hit for 2019

• Keith Kelsey, injured reserve

• Tegray Scales, reserve/future

• Ryan Shazier, reserve/physically unable to perform


Free agents

• L.J. Fort, unrestricted, $705,000 cap hit in 2018

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.