ShareThis Page
Steelers owner Art Rooney II opposes expanding replay | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Steelers owner Art Rooney II opposes expanding replay

Joe Rutter
920784_web1_594110-30fa6db7aee749a284c774a66100bd67
AP
The instant replay booth at Heinz Field before an NFL football game between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Cincinnati Bengals, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018, in Pittsburgh.

NFL owners will be presented a list of proposed rules changes this weekend at the league’s annual meeting in Phoenix.

Steelers president Art Rooney II let it be known Friday that he is not in favor of any proposal that expands the use of instant replay.

Several proposals related to replay expansion will be presented to owners during the meetings that begin Sunday. For a rule to be changed, 24 of the league’s 32 owners would need to approve it.

Rooney indicated in a conference call Friday with reporters that he is not in favor of expanding replay to include pass-interference penalties.

“Replay, at the end of the day, is another human being interpreting the play,” Rooney said, via The Athletic. “While it can be helpful in a lot of cases, but when you start talking about judgment calls, pass interference in particular, you are still putting another human being in the spot of making that decision.

“You never are going to get it perfect no matter how many people are looking at it. That’s another hesitation I have to expand it even further.”


Related: Art Rooney II declines to discuss departures of Brown, Bell


The NFL Competition Committee has asked owners to amend Rule 15, Section 2 for the 2019 season. In addition to having pass-interference plays become subject to review, the committee wants replay expanded to include scoring plays and turnovers negated by a penalty. In a separate proposal, the committee wants Rule 15, Section 2 altered to have replay include “roughing the passer and unnecessary contact against a player who is in a defenseless posture.”

Teams also have offered proposals relating to instant replay. For instance, Denver wants fourth-down plays spotted short of the line to gain to become subject to review. Denver also wants all extra-point and 2-point conversion tries to be subject to review. Washington wants all plays in a game to be subject to a coach’s challenge.

Rooney is concerned that expanding replay rules will increase the length of games.

“We need to continually go in the other direction,” he said. “If anything, try to shorten the game a little bit. It really is the pace of game … that’s something we have to keep in mind.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at jrutter@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.