Steelers sign 2 players to provide depth at WR, RB positions | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Steelers sign 2 players to provide depth at WR, RB positions

Joe Rutter
1954005_web1_gtr-SteelVisit-041219
Florida Atlantic running back Kerrith Whyte Jr. celebrates his touchdown against Central Florida during the second half of an NCAA college football game, Friday, Sept. 21, 2018, in Orlando, Fla. (AP Photo/John Raoux)

In the wake of injuries suffered by wide receivers JuJu Smith-Schuster and Diontae Johnson, plus running back James Conner, on Thursday night in a 21-7 loss at Cleveland, the Pittsburgh Steelers signed two players to their 53-man roster Saturday.

The additions are wide receiver Deion Cain and running back Kerrith Whyte Jr. To make room, the Steelers waived linebacker Jayrone Elliott and running back Tony Brooks-James.

The Steelers lost Smith-Schuster and Johnson to concussions, and Conner exited with a shoulder injury during their loss to the Browns that snapped a four-game losing streak.

Cain, a sixth-round draft pick out of Clemson in 2018, was signed off the Indianapolis Colts practice squad. Cain spent his rookie season on injured reserve after suffering a season-ending injury in training camp. He started three games this season and had four catches for 52 yards before the Colts waived him and added him to their practice squad Nov. 9.


Whyte, a seventh-round pick this year by the Chicago Bears out of Florida Atlantic, was from the Bears’ practice squad. He had 1,358 rushing, 227 receiving and 2,115 kickoff return yards in his career at Florida Atlantic.

The Steelers hosted Whyte for a predraft visit April 11.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.