Steelers sign another draft pick, 4th-round RB Benny Snell |

Steelers sign another draft pick, 4th-round RB Benny Snell

Chris Adamski
Kentucky running back Benny Snell Jr. (26) runs against the Penn State defense during the second half of the Citrus Bowl NCAA college football game, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2019, in Orlando, Fla. (AP Photo/John Raoux)

The Pittsburgh Steelers announced the signing of a fourth draft pick in a 19-hour span with word Wednesday that fourth-round running back Benny Snell agreed to terms.

Snell was one of college football’s best running backs over the past three years, last season earning second-team All-American and first-team All-SEC honors when he had 1,449 rushing yards and 16 touchdowns for Kentucky.

Snell, the No. 122 overall pick, left the Wildcats as the school’s career rushing leader after just three seasons on the field. He will compete with last year’s fifth-round pick, Jaylen Samuels, for snaps and carries this season as part of the backfield with returning Pro Bowler James Conner.

Financial terms were not disclosed, but under the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement all rookie contracts are for four years and the compensation is virtually predetermined via a slotting system.

Earlier Wednesday, the Steelers announced the signing of third-round receiver Diontae Johnson; on Tuesday, it was sixth-round picks Sutton Smith and Isaiah Buggs.

Five other picks have yet to sign.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.