Steelers training camp preview: Breaking down the special teams | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Steelers training camp preview: Breaking down the special teams

Chris Adamski
1425795_web1_gtr-steelers02-052919
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers’ Chris Boswell kicks with free agent Matthew Wright during OTAs on May 29, 2019, at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

A player-by-player look at the Steelers offense entering training camp:

Chris Boswell

No. 9, 6-2, 185 | Boswell’s struggles last season were well-documented after he was the AFC Pro Bowl kicker and signed a big contract earlier in 2018. Boswell bet on himself in the spring, deferring a $2 million roster bonus until after training camp.


Matthew Wright


No. 16, 6-0, 179 | Signed by the Steelers immediately after the draft, Wright will compete with Boswell. He made 77.4% of his field goals and 98.5% of his extra points over three seasons as UCF’s kicker.


Jordan Berry

No. 4, 6-5, 195 | He has held the Steelers’ punting job since beating out incumbent and fellow Aussie Brad Wing during training camp in 2015. Although Berry was shaky enough in September that the Steelers auditioned possible replacements, they re-signed him when he hit free agency in March. He averaged 43.7 yards on his 63 punts in 2018.


Ian Berryman

No. 8, 6-0, 200 | Berry’s job isn’t totally safe because of Berryman, a rookie who the Steelers targeted as a priority to sign as soon as the draft ended. Berryman averaged 43.8 yards on his 206 punts at Western Carolina.


Kameron Canaday

No. 57, 6-4, 245 | Unlike the other specialists, Canaday does not face direct competition from a newly signed player. But rookie Trevor Wood is listed as “tight end/long snapper,” so Canaday better not get complacent.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.