Steelers WR Diontae Johnson makes Pro Football Focus watch list |

Steelers WR Diontae Johnson makes Pro Football Focus watch list

Joe Rutter
Toledo wide receiver Diontae Johnson runs a drill during the NFL football scouting combine, Saturday, March 2, 2019, in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

Pro Football Focus has high hopes for wide receiver Diontae Johnson in his first season with the Pittsburgh Steelers.

This week, the web site included Johnson among the top 10 players to win offensive rookie of the year honors. Johnson was ranked No. 9.

Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray, drafted No. 1 overall, is Pro Football Focus’ top pick. Woodland Hills native Miles Sanders, who was drafted by the Philadelphia Eagles, has the No. 2 spot on the list.

Johnson is the third wide receiver among the top 10, trailing Deebo Samuel of the San Francisco 49ers (No. 5) and A.J. Brown of the Tennessee Titans (No. 8).

Here is what Pro Football Focus wrote about Johnson’s prospects of winning the award:

“Not the next receiver you were expecting? Johnson goes to a Steelers club that heaved the ball all over the yard last season – Ben Roethlisberger’s 675 passing attempts were 36 more than any quarterback in the NFL. A whopping 164 of those targets are up for grabs with the departure of Antonio Brown. Now Johnson won’t replace Brown’s production, but he should replace his role within the offense with a very similar skill set.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.