ShareThis Page

Bengals' Vontaze Burfict appears to kick Steelers fullback Rossevelt Nix

Chris Harlan
| Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017, 10:24 p.m.
Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell follows fullback Roosevelt Nix past the Bengals' Vontaze Burfict during the fourth quarter Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017, at Heinz Field.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell follows fullback Roosevelt Nix past the Bengals' Vontaze Burfict during the fourth quarter Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017, at Heinz Field.

Steelers fullback Roosevelt Nix just "played on" after Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict kicked him. The incident occurred early Sunday as Burfict was on his back and kicked his feet toward Nix's facemask.

"You could see it: I was kicked, but we played on," said Nix, who added: "I felt it. The ref said he didn't see it, so just keep playing."

Burfict declined comment after the game Sunday. He's been suspended twice by the NFL and fined eight times for salary forfeitures of more than $2 million.

Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell was unhappy with Burfict's antics.

"I just don't like when guys come do dirty plays," Bell said. "It's OK to play tough and try to hit guys hard during the course of the play, that's fine. But I don't like the unnecessary roughness and things that happen after the play, like my fullback got kicked in the face.

"That's just not football to me. I don't think that's respectable play. For me I just like playing respectable football, whether you play tough or whatever it, if it's within the play is all fine. But after the play, unnecessary things trying to hurt people, I don't like that."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me