ShareThis Page

League leaders clash as Steelers' Ben Roethlisberger faces Patriots' Tom Brady

Chris Adamski
| Wednesday, Dec. 13, 2017, 7:52 p.m.

They have been around seemingly forever, two future Hall of Famers who have faced each other in everything from AFC championship games to season openers and late-season showdowns over the past 14 years.

But never in their nine meetings have Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger been ranked so highly among NFL passing leaders.

When Brady (3,865) and Roethlisberger (3,744) lead the New England Patriots and Steelers, respectively, into Sunday's 4:25 p.m. game at Heinz Field, it will be the rare December game pitting the NFL's top two in passing yardage.

“He's the best in the world, maybe the best that's ever done it,” Roethlisberger said. “Of course, we're going to relish the opportunities (to play against each other).”

Brady and Roethlisberger have combined to represent the AFC in 10 of the past 16 Super Bowls, claiming seven rings in total. They also have combined for three NFL passing-yardage titles but never have finished in the top five in the same year, something that seems destined to change in 2017.

Brady's dominance over the Steelers is well documented: including the postseason, he has won 10 of 12 with a 29-to-3 touchdown-to-interception ratio, 70.0 completion percentage and 115.1 passer rating.

His numbers with Roethlisberger as his opponent are even better: 70.2 completion percentage, 116.7 rating.

That's helped contribute to a misconception that Roethlisberger has floundered against New England. But a more accurate account is that he has been better-than-average (97.3 passer rating, counting the playoffs) — it's just that he has been outshined by Brady.

So even with Brady coming off his worst game (measured by passer rating) in more than four years (59.5 in a shocking loss in Miami), the Steelers would be wise to expect a more vintage version of Brady on Sunday.

“Tom competes well every week. If you just watch Tom compete during the week, I don't think you would know what the result was from the game before,” New England coach Bill Belichick said. “He's consistent.”

A month into this season, it appeared as if Brady was on his way to becoming the NFL's oldest MVP when he was throwing for almost 350 yards a game with 11 touchdowns, one interception and a 111.9 rating.

At that point, Roethlisberger was coming off one of the worst games of his career. After throwing five interceptions in a loss to Jacksonville, he joked about “not having it anymore,” his TD-to-INT ratio fell to 5-to-6 and his passer rating plummeted to 75.8.

Since Week 5, though, Roethlisberger has been — statistically — better than Brady. Roethlisberger has thrown for more yards (2,475 to 2,163) and touchdowns (18 to 16) with better a batter yards-per-attempt (8.1 to 7.5) and passer rating (100.8 to 100.6).

He also directed a team that went 8-0 in that span.

“He's got great toughness, can stand in the pocket, has great vision, can find receivers,” Belichick said. “… He makes great decisions and has great vision to get the ball to guys that you kind of start to fall off of as the play extends. Really, really good player. Tough, durable and can make all the throws and all of the plays to beat you.”

Steelers cornerback Joe Haden is one of the rare players in the locker room who has faced Roethlisberger and Brady.

“There's similarities,” Haden said. “They go to the matchups … Some quarterbacks, they make the game a little bit harder than it is. If (Brady or Roethlisberger) sees a matchup against a dude that they don't feel like can cover, Brady will go to him the whole time all the way down the field. Instead of feeling like you have to spread it around, go to what is working. (Brady) does that really well, and so does Ben.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me