ShareThis Page

Report: Cardinals request permission to interview Steelers' Mike Munchak

Joe Rutter
| Monday, Jan. 1, 2018, 8:10 p.m.
Steelers offensive line coach Mike Munchak Aug. 2015 at St Vincent College.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Steelers offensive line coach Mike Munchak Aug. 2015 at St Vincent College.

Hours after Bruce Arians retired as coach of the Arizona Cardinals, the organization has asked for permission to interview Steelers offensive line coach Mike Munchak for the job, the NFL Network reported Monday.

Munchak, 57, just finished his fourth regular season with the Steelers.

It is not known whether the Steelers granted permission.

Before joining the Steelers, Munchak spent three seasons as coach of the Tennessee Titans, compiling a 22-26 record. A 2001 inductee in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, Munchak has earned praise for his work with the Steelers offensive line.

Arians, a former Steelers offensive coordinator, retired Monday after wrapping up an 8-8 season a day earlier. He compiled a 50-32-1 record, including playoffs, in five seasons and left with the most wins in franchise history.

The past two Cardinals coaches were Steelers assistants. Before Arians, the Cardinals employed Ken Whisenhunt, the final offensive coordinator in Bill Cowher's tenure with the Steelers, for six seasons.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me