ShareThis Page

Brian O'Neill runs fastest time for offensive lineman at NFL Combine

Joe Rutter
| Friday, March 2, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

INDIANAPOLIS – Brian O'Neill's background as a high school wide receiver and converted college tight end paid off Friday in the 40-yard dash at the NFL Combine.

The former Pitt tackle ran the distance in 4.80 seconds, the fastest time among all offensive linemen and the best time for a lineman since 2013.

It also was the third-fastest recorded time for an offensive lineman at the combine since 2006.

O'Neill also had the best time among offensive linemen in the three-cone drill, at 7.14 seconds.

The 6-foot-7, 297-pound O'Neill has been projected as a first-round pick by some publications. Others have him going in the second or third rounds.

"It didn't really surprise me knowing his background as a tight end," Pitt wide receiver Jester Weah said. "He's a very athletic lineman. I'm proud and happy for him."

On Thursday, O'Neill talked about the benefits that playing tight end had on his conversion to the offensive line.

"I think there's some things athletically that you can't teach in terms of some things you can either do or you can't," he said. "And the things that kind of get you to the next level in terms of playing offensive line is more technical stuff and those can be taught.

"And I know speed and agility and that kind of stuff can be worked on and that can definitely be improved. But I think you start out at a higher base level than if you played line your whole life. At least, I feel that way."

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Pitt offensive lineman Brian O'Neill speaks to the media at the NFL Combine on March 1, 2018 in Indianapolis.
Getty Images
Pitt offensive lineman Brian O'Neill speaks to the media at the NFL Combine on March 1, 2018 in Indianapolis.
Brian ONeill, Pitt
Brian ONeill, Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me