ShareThis Page
Steelers

Steelers' JuJu Smith-Schuster ranks No. 9 by PFF when facing off-man coverage

Joe Rutter
| Thursday, June 28, 2018, 3:51 p.m.
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Shuster looks for the ball during minicamp June 13, 2018, at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Shuster looks for the ball during minicamp June 13, 2018, at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

JuJu Smith-Schuster not only had some of the best numbers among NFL rookie wide receivers last season. He also was among the most productive receivers — rookies and veterans — when facing off-man coverage.

According to Pro Football Focus rankings, Smith-Schuster was the ninth-most productive receiver when going against off-man coverage, earning him honorable-mention status. Under the criteria of WR rating (or passer rating when targeted), Smith-Schuster had a 127.4 mark for 2017.

Here is what Pro Football Focus wrote:

“Smith-Schuster flourished as a rookie. Against off-man coverage, he caught 43-of-53 targets for 493 receiving yards and six scores, tying him for the most touchdowns versus off-man coverage.”

The top five receivers in off-man coverage were Sammy Watkins, Tyreek Hill, Robert Woods, Justin Hardy and Brandin Cooks. Included among Smith-Schuster in the honorable-mention category were Marvin Jones Jr., Tyrell Williams, Will Fuller and Albert Wilson.

No Steelers receiver, not even Antonio Brown, was ranked in the top 10 when facing press coverage, according to Pro Football Focus.

Smith-Schuster led all NFL rookies with 917 receiving yards and seven touchdowns in 2017. He also was tops with six catches of at least 40 yards.

Smith-Schuster missed all of organized team activities and minicamp with an unspecified knee injury. He is expected to be ready to go when training camp opens July 25.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me