ShareThis Page
Steelers

Agent: Le'Veon Bell's heavy workload reason he hasn't reported to Steelers

Joe Rutter
| Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2018, 12:45 p.m.
The Steelers’ Le’Veon Bell tries to keep his balance against the New England Patriots on Sunday, Dec. 17, 2017.
The Steelers’ Le’Veon Bell tries to keep his balance against the New England Patriots on Sunday, Dec. 17, 2017.

The risk of injury and overuse is a likely reason that running back Le’Veon Bell hasn’t yet reported to the Pittsburgh Steelers, his agent indicated Tuesday morning.

Adisa Bakari, speaking to SiriusXM NFL Radio, didn’t directly say when Bell’s absence from the team would end, but he indicated that an anticipated heavy workload is the reason his client is staying away.

Asked what is the plan for Bell reporting to the team, Bakari responded by answering the question with a question.

“You’re Kevin Colbert and Mike Tomlin. You have possibly a once-in-a-generation player for one more season. What would your plan be?” Bakari said.

The host responded that he would use Bell as much as possible to help the Steelers win a Super Bowl.

“You can read in between those lines,” Bakari said.

Bakari was asked whether that meant Bell would stay away from the team through Week 10 when he must report in order to have his season qualify toward free agency.

“When we find out,” Bakari said. “I think Mike Tomlin said it best yesterday. He’ll get there when he gets there, and we’ll address those issues when he arrives.”

Bell hasn’t signed his $14.544 million franchise-tag tender. If he doesn’t join the team by 4 p.m. Saturday, he would forfeit his first weekly paycheck of $855,000. Even if Bell does report, the Steelers could request a two-week roster exemption for Bell, which would enable them not to pay him until he is activated to the 53-man roster.

General manager Kevin Colbert declined requests for comment, and the Steelers released a statement through spokesman Burt Lauten. “We are not going to discuss any conversations through the media. If Adisa (Bakari) would like to talk further, he has the phone number to our offices.”

In 15 games last season, Bell led the NFL with 406 touches. He touched the ball 60 times more than the No. 2-ranked player. Bell played under a $12.12 million franchise tag in 2017, and it increased by 120 percent when the Steelers applied it for a second time this past offseason.

Meanwhile, Todd Gurley of the Los Angeles Rams, who was a couple of years away from free agency, signed a four-year contract that has $45 million guaranteed, including a $21 million signing bonus. Bell reportedly turned down a deal worth $70 million that didn’t have nearly as much guaranteed compensation. Defensive lineman Aaron Donald, quarterback Aaron Rodgers and wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. signed record contracts, and Khalil Mack was able to force a trade and get a multi-year deal from the Chicago Bears rather than report to the Oakland Raiders.

“One of the things that we can take away from this is that the franchise tag as a strategy to secure your most valuable player for long-term lo longer works,” Bakari said.

Bakari said he doesn’t blame the Steelers for wanting to get the maximum out of Bell in his anticipated final season with the franchise.

“But we represent people. I represent Le’Veon, his family, his future concerns” he said. “I’ll be candid. If my clients win Super Bowls and go into the Hall of Fame, that’s great, that’s phenomenal. I’ll be the biggest cheerleader. But my No. 1 concern is to make sure my clients leave their sport financially secure.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at jrutter@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me