ShareThis Page

Roethlisberger: 'I had to suck it up' in 2nd half of Steelers vs. Falcons

Joe Rutter
| Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018, 2:06 p.m.
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger throws the ball to the end zone but is picked off by the Falcons’ Damontae Kazee in the second quarter Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018 at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger throws the ball to the end zone but is picked off by the Falcons’ Damontae Kazee in the second quarter Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018 at Heinz Field.

If Ben Roethlisberger looked like an improved quarterback in the second half Sunday against the Atlanta Falcons, it was because he recognized a previous elbow injury was hurting his throwing motion.

On his weekly 93.7 FM radio segment Tuesday, Roethlisberger said he adjusted his mechanics at halftime, which helped him complete 10 of 12 passes for 155 yards and two touchdowns in the second half of the Pittsburgh Steelers’ 41-17 win against the Atlanta Falcons.

“The second half, I had a talk with myself and said I had to suck it up and deliver the ball like I need to and force my way through it,” Roethlisberger said.

Roethlisberger hooked up with Antonio Brown on touchdown passes of 9 and 47 yards in the second half, the latter one on a deep pass down the left sideline. He had a perfect 158.3 passer rating after intermission.

It was marked improvement from the first half when Roethlisberger completed 9 of 17 passes for 95 yards with a touchdown, an interception and a 64.6 passer rating.

“I was just dealing with a little bit of an elbow issue,” Roethlisberger said. “It made me drop my elbow a little bit for the comfort factor, which causes the ball to sail.”

Roethlisberger injured his elbow late in overtime of the season opener against Cleveland on a strip sack. Roethlisberger missed two days of practice that week and has not practiced Wednesdays in subsequent weeks.

“We’ve been dealing with it,” Roethlisberger said. “It’s something I need to mentally get over in terms of my throwing motion. I’ve got to keep the arm high to keep the ball driving instead of sailing, that’s all.”

On his show, Roethlisberger also lobbied for running back James Conner to get regular carries once Le’Veon Bell rejoins the team, which could happen next week, according to an ESPN report.

Conner rushed for 110 yards on 21 carries and two touchdowns Sunday. He also caught four passes for 75 yards.

Conner ranks seventh in the NFL in rushing with 384 yards. He ranks eighth with 581 yards from scrimmage.

“I don’t think we put him on the shelf by any means,” Roethlisberger said. “Granted, I think Le’Veon is one of the best in the business, and we can all understand that and agree on that. What James needs to understand is, he needs to say the right things and he should. He’s a younger guy with a veteran awesome football player ahead of him.

“But when Le’Veon comes back, in no way, shape or form should James just say, ‘It’s all yours. I’m going to sit back and when you need me, use me.’

“I will push for James to get as much as he can. We’ve see great things from him in all phases of football. He’s picking up blitzes, he’s catching the ball, he’s running hard, he’s making plays, and he’s playing with a passion.

“We need to keep using that.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me