ShareThis Page
Steelers

Steelers' improved defense among 5 things that stood out in win over Bengals

Joe Rutter
| Monday, Oct. 15, 2018, 8:03 a.m.
Pittsburgh Steelers running back James Conner (30) picks up wide receiver Antonio Brown (84) after he scored a touchdown during an NFL football game against the Cincinnati Bengals, Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018, in Cincinnati. The Steelers won 28-21.
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers running back James Conner (30) picks up wide receiver Antonio Brown (84) after he scored a touchdown during an NFL football game against the Cincinnati Bengals, Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018, in Cincinnati. The Steelers won 28-21.

Five things we learned from Steelers 28, Bengals 21:

1. The defense is starting to find its way

Had the game ended with 3 minutes, 32 seconds remaining and the Pittsburgh Steelers leading by 20-14, much of the postgame talk would have centered around the performance of the defense. To that point, the Cincinnati Bengals had 187 net yards, including 35 in the second half.

Then, Andy Dalton led the Bengals on a nine-play, 75-yard touchdown drive that put the Steelers in a 21-20 hole with 1:18 remaining. This, of course, set the stage for Ben Roethlisberger’s 31-yard touchdown pass to Antonio Brown with 10 seconds remaining.

The Bengals would finish with 275 total yards, which easily was the fewest allowed by the Steelers this season. And, for the second game in a row, the Steelers held an opponent to 62 yards rushing.

Another encouraging sign was that Stephon Tuitt got his first sack of the season. Javon Hargrave and Vince Williams got the others. The secondary yielded one pass longer than 20 yards – and it went for only 23.

All in all, it was an encouraging sign for a defense that struggled mightily in September.

2. JuJu Smith-Schuster’s best grab wasn’t on a pass

The second-year wide receiver overcame two early drops to lead the Steelers with 111 receiving yards on seven catches. He had an acrobatic catch at the Bengals 1, and his 23-yard catch set up the game winner, but it was his fumble recovery in the fourth quarter that helped establish a six-point lead.

With the Steelers leading 17-14 and facing a third-and-2 at the Cincinnati 6, Roethlisberger flicked a pass at the line of scrimmage to tight end Vance McDonald. The ball became dislodged, but Smith-Schuster pounced on it at the 6. Chris Boswell’s second field goal of the game hiked the lead to 20-14.

Had the Bengals recovered the fumble with 3:35 left, the strategy in the waning moments might have changed drastically. Perhaps the Bengals don’t drive down the field with such urgency since the deficit is now three points, not six. And maybe the Bengals, after scoring their touchdown, play it safer on defense in the final minute, knowing the Steelers – now trailing by four points instead of one – need to go the length of the field to win it. Maybe there is no zero-coverage defense for Roethlisberger to exploit on his toss to Brown that went for a 31-yard score.

Smith-Schuster’s fumble recovery rendered all of the hypotheticals moot.

3. Roethlisberger kept his uniform clean

For the second game in a row, the offensive line kept Roethlisberger off his back side. The Bengals, like the Atlanta Falcons a week prior, didn’t record a sack on the Steelers quarterback.

Roethlisberger was hit just one time in the 46 times he dropped back to pass as the offensive line contained the Bengals’ pass-rushing duo of Geno Atkins and Carlos Dunlap.

The line also paved the way for James Conner to rush for 111 yards on 19 carries, a 5.8 average that represented a season high for the second-year running back.

4. Holding calls were worth snapping about

The long snapper is the most anonymous player on a team – at least until a snap goes awry and costs his team valuable points.

It wasn’t that bad for second-year long snapper Kam Canaday. Boswell made all four of his kicks (two field goals, two extra points). Still, Canaday was called twice for holding after Jordan Berry punts pinned the Bengals deep in their end.

The first infraction came after the opening series of the game. Berry’s 32-yard punt resulted in a fair catch at the 12. Canaday’s hold, however, gave the Bengals possession at the 22.

The second holding call against Canaday came late in the third quarter after a 35-yard punt and gave Bengals the ball at their 20 instead of the 10. Thankfully for the Steelers, neither of the penalties led to points for Cincinnati.

5. Dirty play was kept to a minimum

Smith-Schuster called the game the most physical one he has ever played, yet this one didn’t have a typical Steelers-Bengals feel to it.

Save for Vontaze Burfict’s shoulder shot to the back of Brown’s neck in the third quarter, the game was free of controversial hits that have defined the series in recent seasons. Not one personal foul was called on either team.

The most egregious foul called against the Bengals was a block above the waist on special teams. For the Steelers, Artie Burns was flagged for 14 yards on pass interference.

Some pushing and shoving took place near the Bengals sideline after the final gun. Maybe that will set the stage for a more heated rematch when the Bengals visit Heinz Field on Dec. 30.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at jrutter@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me