ShareThis Page

Steelers' Le'Veon Bell sends upside-down tweets, asks not to be judged

Joe Rutter
| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 8:39 p.m.
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger directs running back Le’Veon Bell during a game against the Ravens on Sunday, Dec. 10, 2017.
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger directs running back Le’Veon Bell during a game against the Ravens on Sunday, Dec. 10, 2017.

The latest twist in the Le'Veon Bell saga has been turned upside down.

Bell, who has remained silent on social media until recent days, sent out two cryptic tweets on his verified Twitter account Wednesday night that were posted upside down, forcing readers to adjust their phones to make sense of them.

Here is what the Pittsburgh Steelers running back wrote (with the text properly displayed):

"Just about everybody has an opinion on my life and worried about what I'm doing... don't judge me off my decisions because maybe this isn't what you'd do... but most people don't take the time to just simply read between the lines... and that's clearly on them...

"I'm not apologizing for what I believe is right for myself, family, and the rest of my peers, period... also if you're really finding the time to figure out what I'm saying, you've proved by point."

Bell has forfeited $7.7 million of his $14.544 million salary while staying away from the team and refusing to sign his franchise-tag tender. Bell departed Miami earlier in the week and reportedly is in Pittsburgh while he determines when to rejoin the team.

If Bell doesn't report by 4 p.m. on Tuesday, he will be unable to play in the NFL this season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me