ShareThis Page

Steelers still eyeing long-term deal with Wallace

| Friday, June 15, 2012, 7:14 p.m.
Steelers reciever Mike Wallace against the Broncos during AFC playoff action Jan. 2012. 
Chaz Palla | Tribune Review
Steelers reciever Mike Wallace against the Broncos during AFC playoff action Jan. 2012. Chaz Palla | Tribune Review

Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert said he does not expect quarterback Ben Roethlisberger to change his swashbuckling style of play, even if one of his favorite targets' status remains an unknown.

On Friday, the Steelers did not reduce the one-year, $2.7 million offer they had made to restricted free agent Mike Wallace.

The team had until midnight to reduce that offer by more than $2 million to $577,055, but they never seriously considered exercising that option.

Meanwhile, Roethlisberger's approach — and the amount of punishment he exposes himself to while extending plays — has been under scrutiny since the Steelers made a change at offensive coordinator, replacing Bruce Arians with Todd Haley.

“Ben is who he is, and that's OK,” Colbert said Friday.

“Ben has always looked to create big plays, and that's OK because he's won games for us doing that.”

The Steelers may have to win games for a significant part of this season without two established starters, and neither is Wallace.

Running back Rashard Mendenhall and nose tackle Casey Hampton are recovering from serious knee injuries, and each has started working out again to various degrees.

Mendenhall, who has averaged more than 1,000 rushing yards in his three seasons as a starter, tore the ACL in his right knee Jan. 1 in Cleveland.

Hampton suffered the same injury to his left knee a week later in a playoff loss in Denver.

“My guess is they'll open the season on PUP (the physically unable to perform list),” Colbert said.

“You've got to remember both of those injuries happened late in the year.”

Mendenhall and Hampton, each of whom is in the final year of his contract, wouldn't be eligible to play until after the Steelers' sixth game if they start the season on the PUP list.

Equally unknown is what will happen with Wallace, who has averaged more than 1,000 receiving yards in his first three seasons and wants to be among the highest-paid receivers in the NFL.

Wallace skipped offseason practices because of his unhappiness over the one-year contract the Steelers offered in March.

While the team could have reduced the offer, Colbert said, “That was never our intention.”

Several of Wallace's teammates, including Roethlisberger, have said they expect him to report on time to training camp, which starts July 25.

When asked whether he shares that optimism, Colbert said, “All I can say is we're in negotiations, and our goal has always been to do a long-term deal.”

Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me