ShareThis Page
Steelers

Steelers matchup: Wide receivers vs. Jets' cornerbacks

| Sunday, Sept. 16, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown gets away from the Broncos' Chris Harris during a second-quarter touchdown drive at Sports Authority Field at Mile High on Sunday.
(Chaz Palla | Tribune Review)
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown gets away from the Broncos' Chris Harris during a second-quarter touchdown drive at Sports Authority Field at Mile High on Sunday. (Chaz Palla | Tribune Review)

STEELERS WRs vs. JETS CBs

Matchup: With Darrelle Revis ruled out, the Jets no longer enjoy their usual depth at cornerback. They still have Antonio Cromartie and Kyle Wilson, but not many teams have three top-notch receivers like the Steelers do in Mike Wallace, Antonio Brown and Emmanuel Sanders. The Jets find themselves in a tough position and likely will have to play a lot more zone than their typical man-to-man coverage to compensate.

Steelers WRs: Wallace, Brown and Sanders played 52 of the Steelers' 71 snaps a week ago in Denver. They were targeted 22 times by Ben Roethlisberger, catching 12 passes for 166 yards and a touchdown. The Steelers will try to expose the Jets' man-to-man defense by taking shots down the field in certain scenarios, especially to Wallace.Jets CBs: With Revis out, it changes everything. Wilson moves to starter, and the Jets will have to adjust around him. The Jets usually could afford to play strictly man because of the three former No. 1 picks in Revis, Cromartie and Wilson, but that likely will change now. All three intercepted Buffalo quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick last week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me