ShareThis Page

Steelers notebook: Bell impresses in debut

| Sunday, Sept. 29, 2013, 10:12 p.m.
Steelers' running back Le'Veon Bell reaches out to stiff-arm the Vikings' Chad Greenway on Sunday, Sept. 29, 2013, at Wembley Stadium in London.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers' running back Le'Veon Bell reaches out to stiff-arm the Vikings' Chad Greenway on Sunday, Sept. 29, 2013, at Wembley Stadium in London.

On any other day, Le'Veon Bell's impressive performance in his first NFL game — 57 yards, two touchdowns and a flip into the end zone to finish off the first score — would have generated headline news in Pittsburgh.

But not when the Steelers lost to fall to 0-4.

“I did a couple of things, but there are a lot more things I can work at and can better. I can only improve and get better and work at my craft,” said Bell, who missed three games with mid-foot sprain.

His foot was checked briefly during the third quarter — “I tweaked it a little bit,” he said — but he said afterward he felt fine. He is the first Steelers rookie running back to run for two touchdowns in a game since Bam Morris in 1994.

Injury report

Left guard Ramon Foster injured a pectoral muscle in the first half and was replaced by Kelvin Beachum. Ben Roethlisberger struck his throwing hand against a Vikings player's hand, hurting his index finger, but didn't miss any playing time. He was checked over following the game. Inside linebacker Kion Wilson injured a hamstring — coach Mike Tomlin did not say how seriously — and receiver Markus Wheaton broke a pinkie finger, although he stayed in the game. The injured players have two weeks to heal since the Steelers don't play again until Oct. 13 at the Jets.

Jet lag an issue?

The Steelers didn't arrive until Friday, three days after the Vikings, and LaMarr Woodley said he wished they came sooner. At 1 a.m. Sunday London time, or 17 hours before kickoff, Bell posted a social media video complaining of not being able to sleep. But none of the Steelers would blame jet lag or sleep issues with them falling behind 10-0; Antonio Brown said players were given intravenous fluids to keep them hydrated. “I don't think it was an issue,” Troy Polamalu said. “It wasn't for me.”

Adams struggles

Vikings defensive star Jared Allen manhandled left tackle Mike Adams numerous times while getting 2 12 sacks. But coach Mike Tomlin didn't pull Adams, partly because Beachum already was in for the injured Foster. “It doesn't matter if you come out and make some bad plays, you've got to get yourself out of the tank,” said Adams, a second-round draft pick in 2012. “Obviously, I've got to do a better job and I'll work to get better every day.”

Fan support

The Steelers players were more than impressed with London's massive Wembley Stadium and a remarkably enthused crowd that arrived four to five hours ahead of the kickoff. Many Steelers said they were glad they made the trip, and regret only that they didn't win. “Fan-support wise, (the) fun level, (the) great city, it's an A-plus,” safety Ryan Clark said. According to Antonio Brown, “It's an amazing stadium.”

Cotchery delivers

Jerricho Cotchery was the Steelers' leading receiver with five catches (on six targets) for 103 yards, including a clutch 36-yard catch on the final drive. It was his first 100-yard game in four years, or since he had eight catches for 108 yards for the Jets against Tennessee on Sept. 27, 2009.

Need to score early

The Steelers now have 11 turnovers and no takeaways, a minus-11 rating that more than explains their 0-4 record. As Heath Miller said, the Steelers' primary failing has been constantly falling behind. “It's hard for our defense to create turnovers, havoc when they (opponents) are handing the ball off with a two-score lead,” Miller said.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me