ShareThis Page

Steelers won't change contract policy for Antonio Brown

| Thursday, Aug. 20, 2015, 2:09 p.m.
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown makes a catch in front of cornerback Kevin Fogg during practice Sunday, Aug. 16, 2015, at St. Vincent.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown makes a catch in front of cornerback Kevin Fogg during practice Sunday, Aug. 16, 2015, at St. Vincent.

Like it or not, Antonio Brown is stuck with his current contract for the next two years. That's just the way the Steelers do business.

General manager Kevin Colbert on Thursday told Trib Total Media there has been no change in a long-standing organizational policy to not rework a non-quarterback contract with multiple years remaining.

“It was something that was here before I got here, and I am sure it will continue after I am gone,” Colbert said. “It is just the consistency within the organization. It is something that we believe in and it works for us, so I don't see it changing.”

Brown's contract runs through 2017, meaning the Steelers won't even consider a new or reworked deal for another 19 months.

Brown was unavailable for comment Thursday but said earlier in training camp the Steelers “did a great deal with me, rewarding me with a contract (two) years in.”

Coach Mike Tomlin avoided comment, except to say: “I don't address those things. I'm here to talk about our preparation and our play. That's not my bag, particularly in this setting.”

The deal Brown signed in 2012 was a five-year extension for $42 million. He had started only three career games to that point. Agent Drew Rosenhaus declined comment when reached via email.

Brown, through Rosenhaus, alluded to a possible holdout as far back as April if his contract wasn't reworked. He missed the first week of voluntary conditioning but has been at every practice since, including all four weeks of training camp at St. Vincent.

Rosenhaus met with the Steelers for a courtesy meeting before the team played in Jacksonville.

“Players sign contracts. We expect them to honor them,” Colbert said.

The Steelers have made exceptions before, but for quarterbacks only.

They signed Tommy Maddox in 2004 and Ben Roethlisberger to his second deal with two years left. However, Roethlisberger was forced to wait until the final year of his deal before signing a long-term extension in March.

The Steelers never have extended a position player with more than a year left on his existing deal.

Not even Hines Ward.

After making three straight Pro Bowls from 2001-03, Ward wanted a new contract in 2004, despite having two years left on his deal. The Steelers refused, even though Maddox was extended by a year months prior.

“It has been the position of the organization, and it has always been like that,” Colbert said.

Brown signed the five-year extension to his rookie contract in 2012 after Mike Wallace held out. Brown is owed $6 million this year, $8.25 million in 2016 and $8.71 million in 2017.

Brown, who led the league in receptions and yards last year, is the 14th highest-paid receiver in the NFL by average salary per year.

Nine receivers — Calvin Johnson, Dez Bryant, Demaryius Thomas, Mike Wallace, Vincent Jackson, Larry Fitzgerald, Jeremy Maclin, Brandon Marshall and Randall Cobb — average at least $10 million per season, according to Rosenhaus client T.Y. Hilton recently signed a five-year, $65 million extension. Thomas and Bryant got $70 million deals in July.

Brown, a two-time All-Pro, has 239 receptions (most in NFL) over the past two years, including a franchise record 129 for 1,698 yards with 13 touchdowns last year.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me