Fans react to Steelers-Browns fight: ‘There’s no place for that in sports’ |

Fans react to Steelers-Browns fight: ‘There’s no place for that in sports’

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers and the Browns clear the benches after the Browns’ Myles Garrett ripped off Mason Rudolph’s helmet near the end of Thursday’s game.

What happened at the end of the Steelers-Browns game Thursday night was not football, Western Pennsylvania fans said Friday.

While the NFL doled out suspensions and fines for the fight at the end of the game, fans said that level of violence — Browns defensive lineman Myles Garrett swung Mason Rudolph’s helmet at the Steelers quarterback’s head — has no place in football or sports.

“There was no call for it,” said Mandy Rodgers, of Tarentum. “It was just ridiculous, and I think he [Garrett] should be penalized for it.”

The NFL suspended Garrett indefinitely. Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey, who rushed to defend his quarterback and punched and kicked Garrett in the head, got a three-game suspension. Larry Ogunjobi, a defensive lineman for the Browns, was suspended one game for shoving Rudolph to the ground. Rudolph was not suspended.

There is no excuse for fighting in a sporting event, said Saltsburg resident Charles Shepard, a retired Kiski Prep teacher who coached baseball, swimming and soccer.

“Football is entertainment, and that wasn’t entertainment,” he said.

Charlie Belavic, of Greensburg, said Garrett should be arrested for swinging the helmet at Rudolph’s head. He also felt Pouncey’s suspension was justified, though he expects the center to appeal it.

Barney Hanson, part-owner of The Point Bar and Grill in Greensburg, said Pouncey likely reacted out of anger and in defense of a teammate.

Bloomfield resident Drew Bollman expected a lot of suspensions in the aftermath of the fight. He said Pouncey kicking Garrett in the head was disturbing.

“But as far as using the helmet to hit a player with his own helmet, I’ve never seen anything like that in sports. I don’t think there’s a place for that in sports,” Bollman said. “I think his punishment should be pretty serious to set precedence that that’s not going to be tolerated in the NFL.”

Ed Daquila, of Freeport, said Garrett’s suspension is justified.

“I’ve just never seen anything like it,” Daquila said.

Besides the fight, the Steelers overall performance also was pretty terrible, some fans said.

“The Steelers picked a funny time to fight when they did not show a darn thing all game,” said John Meadows of Jeannette. “They showed no fight the whole game.”

John Vazquez, 65, of Kennedy, said there were too many injuries and head shots throughout the entire game. He blamed Cleveland and said they should have been forced to forfeit the game.

“Steelers win. You lose,” he said. “There is no room in football for that violence.”

Vazquez said Garrett should be suspended for the season.

“That should send a strong message that there’s no place in the NFL or any sport for violence,” Vazquez said.

Staff writers Teghan Simonton, Tom Davidson and Joe Napsha contributed to this report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.