Pittsburgh zoning board sacks Steelers’ seat-painting plan at Heinz Field | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Pittsburgh zoning board sacks Steelers’ seat-painting plan at Heinz Field

Bob Bauder
1550561_web1_IMG_4501
Pittsburgh Planning Department
he Pittsburgh zoning board has denied an appeal by the Steelers for permission to paint Heinz Field seats in the form of a sign. The Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment has denied a request by the Steelers for a sign in lower end zone seating at Heinz Field.

The Pittsburgh zoning board has denied an appeal by the Steelers for permission to paint Heinz Field seats in the form of a sign, ruling that it constitutes a “roof sign” prohibited by city zoning regulations.

PSSI Stadium LLC, a team affiliate, sought permission to paint seats on the north side of the stadium, arguing that it should be exempt because it would be an “interior element” and not visible from the outside.

A zoning administrator in April determined that the city’s zoning code prohibited the sign. The Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment agreed in a seven-page decision released Thursday.

“Because PSSI Stadium did not specify what words or logos might be included on the proposed sign, it did not definitely demonstrate that the proposed sign would be a ‘non-advertising sign,’” the board noted in the decision, adding that PSSI also “offered no credible evidence or testimony that the proposed sign … would not be visible from the exterior.”

The team has not decided whether it will appeal to Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, according to attorney Shawn N. Gallagher, who represents the Steelers.

“We disagree with the decision and we’ll review it and consider our options,” Gallagher said. “After we review the decision, we’ll make a decision on whether to appeal.”

Under the zoning code, signs on the inside of buildings that are not designed to be visible from the outside and are not used for advertising are “permitted in any district with unlimited size and interior location.”

Several city residents lined up in opposition to the Steelers’ sign, saying it would detract from the city’s landmark hilltop vistas and architectural ambiance.

The Steelers argued that Highmark Stadium, home of the Riverhounds soccer team, has “Hounds” printed on seating and that PNC Park features center field shrubbery spelling out the name “Pirates.”

The zoning board said the Riverhounds were granted a variance for the sign and that it was intended to identify only the team. The Steelers did not apply for a variance, the board said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.